Bridge Comparison
Comparing Libre CrossLink to other Bitcoin bridge solutions such as THORchain and Liquid
Comparison with Other Bridge Solutions
Libre CrossLink represents a significant advancement over existing Bitcoin bridging solutions, offering unique capabilities and advantages:
CrossLink vs. Liquid Sidechain
Consensus Mechanism
Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS)
Federated Sidechain
Smart Contract Support
Full Turing-complete WASM
Limited (Simplicity language)
Decentralization
Higher (permissionless validators)
Lower (federated model)
Vault Functionality
Individual segregated vaults
No individual vaults
Programmability
Full smart contract integration
Limited programmability
Speed
~1 second block times
~1 minute block times
Fee Structure
Transaction fee based
Transaction fee based
Liquid is a federated sidechain requiring trust in a small federation of participants, whereas CrossLink uses threshold signatures across a broader set of permissionless validators, enhancing security and decentralization.
CrossLink vs. THORchain
Cryptographic Approach
MPC-TSS with smart contract coordination
Rotating TSS nodes
Primary Focus
Bitcoin-Libre bridge and BTC vaults
Multi-chain DEX and swaps
Smart Contract Capabilities
Full Turing-complete environment
Limited programmability
Individual Vaults
Yes, per-user vault addresses
No individual vaults
Transaction Types
Bridge transfers and programmable vaults
Primarily token swaps
Fee Economics
BTC and USDT fees to validators
RUNE-based economic model
Collateral Architecture
Native BTC as collateral
Requires RUNE bonding
While THORchain also uses TSS technology, Libre CrossLink's integration with Libre's full Turing-complete smart contract platform enables significantly more complex and powerful DeFi applications. THORchain focuses primarily on cross-chain swaps, while CrossLink provides both bridging and advanced vault infrastructure.
CrossLink's Unique Advantages
Dual-purpose architecture - Both a bridge and a vault system
Full programmability - Leverages Libre's complete WASM-based smart contract capabilities
Segregated custody - Individual vaults with complete asset separation
Unwrapped BTC custody option - Direct BTC collateralization without token wrapping
Smart contract orchestration - Bridge operations are governed by transparent smart contracts
Multiple asset types - Supports both wrapped BTC (Fast BTC) and unwrapped BTC in vaults
The most significant difference is CrossLink's integration with Libre's complete smart contract platform, allowing developers to build sophisticated financial applications on top of the bridge infrastructure using familiar languages like C++, TypeScript, Rust, and Go.
Last updated
Was this helpful?